Skip to content

Canadian CONservative under investigation

From the Toronto Star:







Kenney accused of misleading the Commons

OTTAWA-Jason Kenney, the Conservative government's attack dog, now

finds himself under ethical attack - accused of fabricating the truth

just to lash out at the opposition Liberals.



"It's just breathtaking," Liberal House Leader Ralph Goodale said

yesterday. The opposition wants Kenney's head. "He deliberately misled

the House of Commons and he should resign."



The controversy is almost an arcane one, revolving around technical

aspects of Canada's access-to-information law and the complex web of

daily, intergovernmental emails among bureaucrats and political aides.



But the ongoing furor is being fuelled by the big principles being

churned up: privacy, the public's right to scrutinize the government

and now, in light of Kenney's attack stance in the Commons this week,

truth and lies in the partisan fray.



It starts with a story this week in Montreal's Gazette, which revealed

minutes of meetings showing government communication officials bandying

about names of reporters who had filed access-to-information requests.

This raised fears about a serious violation of the access law:

identities of requesters are supposed to be shielded from government

scrutiny.



Even worse, copies of these minutes were forwarded to officials in the

Prime Minister's Office, including Sandra Buckler, communication

director for Stephen Harper.



The government's initial defence was to insist that no political people

actually read the reports of these proceedings.



But then Kenney, the Prime Minister's parliamentary secretary, said he

had a Privy Council Office memo proving that Liberals had indulged in

the same, illegal indiscretion when they were in office. He has now

said this at least a half-dozen times in the House of Commons.



Kenney said the Conservatives were actually raising the standards of

elected office by stopping the practice immediately. The problem,

however, is that the memo says the opposite.



Dale Eisler, assistant secretary to the cabinet and a former

journalist, wrote in the memo: "There was no knowledge of an ATI

(access-to-information) request by any specific reporter. We are never

privy to that information."



The only long-standing practice that Eisler mentions is the actual

circulation of the minutes. "These type of summary reports were

regularly shared with members of the previous government's

communications office."





AS if!! So much for open CONservative government!



> privy to that information."

Trackbacks

No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as Linear | Threaded

No comments

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

Form options